Head to head
SixtyNine EAvsVex Gold EA
Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.
SixtyNine EA leads on 4 of the 5 measures that can be scored.
A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.
- Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost
- 1.92▲
- 1.86▲
- Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss
- 1.21▲
- 0.83▲
- Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high
- 23.3%▲
- 5.4%▲
- Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall
- 7.74▲
- 1.34▲
- Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate
- 44.01%▲
- 5.79%▲
- Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it
- 61.4%▲
- 69.2%▲
- Record lengthHow much evidence there is
- 7 months▲
- 5 months▲
- TradesSample size behind every figure above
- 490▲
- 65▲
- Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans
- 1329.5%▲
- 29.5%▲
- Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance
- $500▲
- $200▲
Why these two are not quite like-for-like
- One record is 1.6× longer than the other — SixtyNine EA has had more time to meet a market it dislikes, which cuts both ways when reading its drawdown.
What each record shows
MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
SixtyNine EA
- Grid / basket positions
- Unbounded losses
Measured from trade history · 490 trades · 7 months
Read the full page →MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
Vex Gold EA
- Unbounded losses
Measured from trade history · 65 trades · 5 months
Read the full page →