Head to head

Dynamic Liquidity IntelligencevsSixtyNine EA

Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.

SixtyNine EA leads on 4 of the 5 measures that can be scored.

A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.

Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost: 1.70; 1.92▲
Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss: 0.25; 1.21▲
Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high: 28.5%; 23.3%▲
Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall: 4.58; 7.74▲
Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate: 45.98%▲; 44.01%
Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it: 87.2%; 61.4%
Record lengthHow much evidence there is: 5 months; 7 months
TradesSample size behind every figure above: 196; 490
Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans: 595.2%; 1329.5%
Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance: $100; $500

Full pageView Dynamic Liquidity Intelligence →View SixtyNine EA →

Why these two are not quite like-for-like

The tracked accounts are 5× apart in size. Percentage growth compounds much faster on a small balance, so the growth figures are not the like-for-like they look.

What each record shows

MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD