Compare

Pick two, and see the same arithmetic on both

Putting two records side by side is easy to do badly. Total growth is the trap: one product shows 83% and another 298%, and the second looks nearly four times better until you notice the first earned its figure in a quarter of the time. Compounded to a monthly rate, the order reverses. So only the measures that survive that test are scored here — the rest are shown underneath, unscored, and the reasons a pair is not like-for-like are spelled out.

First productSecond product

Choosing a pair needs JavaScript. The comparison below is a worked example, and the head-to-head pages linked from it are plain pages that work without it.

AiX Gold MT5 leads on 5 of the 5 measures that can be scored.

A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.

Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost: 1.90; 15.10▲
Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss: 1.90; 7.55▲
Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high: 12.6%; 3.0%▲
Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall: 4.04; 14.14▲
Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate: 10.54%; 354.68%▲
Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it: 50.0%; 66.7%
Record lengthHow much evidence there is: 10 months; 0 months
TradesSample size behind every figure above: 110; 9
Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans: 163.5%; 41.7%
Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance: $300; $742

Full pageView AI Aurum Pivot →View AiX Gold MT5 →

Why these two are not quite like-for-like

One record is 48.5× longer than the other — AI Aurum Pivot has had more time to meet a market it dislikes, which cuts both ways when reading its drawdown.

17 products in the catalogue publish no figures at all, so they are not offered here — there would be nothing to put in a row.