Head to head

Quantum Emperor MT5 vs Quantum Queen X MT5

Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.

Quantum Queen X MT5 leads on 5 of the 5 measures that can be scored.

A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.

Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost: 2.11; 2.69▲
Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss: 0.21; 0.82▲
Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high: 31.1%; 11.2%▲
Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall: 3.29; 6.08▲
Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate: 8.66%; 14.98%▲
Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it: 91.0%; 76.5%
Record lengthHow much evidence there is: 14 months; 28 months
TradesSample size behind every figure above: 1,140; 1,525
Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans: 214.7%; 5130.4%
Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance: $250; $100

Full pageView Quantum Emperor MT5 →View Quantum Queen X MT5 →

Why these two are not quite like-for-like

The two are measured from different sources — Quantum Emperor MT5 from published statistics, Quantum Queen X MT5 from trade history. The ratios are computed the same way, but only a trade-by-trade history supports the full set of risk checks.
One record is 2.1× longer than the other — Quantum Queen X MT5 has had more time to meet a market it dislikes, which cuts both ways when reading its drawdown.
They trade different instruments — GBPUSD against XAUUSD — so the two records were made in different markets.

What each record shows

MT5 · Expert Advisor · GBPUSD