Forex Tool Data

Head to head

Quantum Emperor MT5 vs Quantum King EA

Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.

Quantum King EA leads on 4 of the 5 measures that can be scored.

A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.

Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost
2.11
2.32▲
Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss
0.21
0.82▲
Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high
31.1%
29.3%▲
Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall
3.29▲
2.28
Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate
8.66%
12.02%▲
Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it
91.0%
73.8%
Record lengthHow much evidence there is
14 months
14 months
TradesSample size behind every figure above
1,140
569
Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans
214.7%
405.4%
Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance
$250
$100

What each record shows

MT5 · Expert Advisor · GBPUSD

Quantum Emperor MT5

  • Small wins, large losses

Measured from published statistics · 1,140 trades · 14 months

Read the full page →

MT5 · Expert Advisor

Quantum King EA

Nothing in the published figures raised a flag. The checks that need trade-level data could not be run.

Measured from published statistics · 569 trades · 14 months

Read the full page →

More comparisons