Forex Tool Data

Head to head

Quantum Athena XvsQuantum Emperor MT5

Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.

Quantum Athena X leads on 4 of the 5 measures that can be scored.

A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.

Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost
2.93▲
2.26
Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss
0.91▲
0.20
Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high
36.8%
31.1%▲
Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall
6.98▲
3.03
Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate
24.07%▲
9.01%
Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it
76.2%
91.7%
Record lengthHow much evidence there is
13 months
13 months
TradesSample size behind every figure above
850
1,039
Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans
1679.9%
197.9%
Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance
$50
$250

Why these two are not quite like-for-like

  • The tracked accounts are 5× apart in size. Percentage growth compounds much faster on a small balance, so the growth figures are not the like-for-like they look.
  • They trade different instruments — XAUUSD against GBPUSD — so the two records were made in different markets.

What each record shows

MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD

Quantum Athena X

Nothing in the published figures raised a flag. The checks that need trade-level data could not be run.

Measured from published statistics · 850 trades · 13 months

Read the full page →

MT5 · Expert Advisor · GBPUSD

Quantum Emperor MT5

  • Small wins, large losses

Measured from published statistics · 1,039 trades · 13 months

Read the full page →

More comparisons