Head to head
Prop Firm Gold EAvsQuantum Athena X
Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.
Quantum Athena X leads on 3 of the 5 measures that can be scored.
A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.
- Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost
- 1.27▲
- 2.93▲
- Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss
- 1.20▲
- 0.91▲
- Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high
- 18.4%▲
- 36.8%▲
- Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall
- 1.78▲
- 6.98▲
- Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate
- 4.53%▲
- 24.07%▲
- Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it
- 51.4%▲
- 76.2%▲
- Record lengthHow much evidence there is
- 9 months▲
- 13 months▲
- TradesSample size behind every figure above
- 280▲
- 850▲
- Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans
- 48.9%▲
- 1679.9%▲
- Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance
- $2,500▲
- $50▲
Why these two are not quite like-for-like
- The tracked accounts are 50× apart in size. Percentage growth compounds much faster on a small balance, so the growth figures are not the like-for-like they look.
What each record shows
MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
Prop Firm Gold EA
Nothing in the published figures raised a flag. The checks that need trade-level data could not be run.
Measured from published statistics · 280 trades · 9 months
Read the full page →MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
Quantum Athena X
Nothing in the published figures raised a flag. The checks that need trade-level data could not be run.
Measured from published statistics · 850 trades · 13 months
Read the full page →