Head to head

ThunderGold Scalper vs TwisterPro Scalper

Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.

ThunderGold Scalper leads on 4 of the 5 measures that can be scored.

A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.

Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost: 1.67; 1.95▲
Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss: 0.65▲; 0.47
Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high: 12.2%▲; 19.5%
Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall: 3.71▲; 1.91
Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate: 16.92%▲; 7.07%
Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it: 71.5%; 80.6%
Record lengthHow much evidence there is: 4 months; 8 months
TradesSample size behind every figure above: 137; 98
Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans: 75.9%; 76.1%
Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance: $100; $201

Full pageView ThunderGold Scalper →View TwisterPro Scalper →

Why these two are not quite like-for-like

The two are measured from different sources — ThunderGold Scalper from trade history, TwisterPro Scalper from published statistics. The ratios are computed the same way, but only a trade-by-trade history supports the full set of risk checks.
One record is 2.3× longer than the other — TwisterPro Scalper has had more time to meet a market it dislikes, which cuts both ways when reading its drawdown.

What each record shows

MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD