Head to head
Smart Gold HuntervsTwisterPro Scalper
Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.
TwisterPro Scalper leads on 4 of the 5 measures that can be scored.
A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.
- Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost
- 1.89▲
- 5.80▲
- Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss
- 0.59▲
- 1.60▲
- Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high
- 14.0%▲
- 5.0%▲
- Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall
- 6.91▲
- 10.71▲
- Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate
- 15.69%▲
- 12.46%▲
- Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it
- 76.1%▲
- 78.4%▲
- Record lengthHow much evidence there is
- 6 months▲
- 6 months▲
- TradesSample size behind every figure above
- 188▲
- 74▲
- Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans
- 155.9%▲
- 107.3%▲
- Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance
- $100▲
- $201▲
Why these two are not quite like-for-like
- The two are measured from different sources — Smart Gold Hunter from published statistics, TwisterPro Scalper from trade history. The ratios are computed the same way, but only a trade-by-trade history supports the full set of risk checks.
What each record shows
MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
Smart Gold Hunter
Nothing in the published figures raised a flag. The checks that need trade-level data could not be run.
Measured from published statistics · 188 trades · 6 months
Read the full page →MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
TwisterPro Scalper
No risk flags raised by the trade history.
Measured from trade history · 74 trades · 6 months
Read the full page →