Head to head
SixtyNine EA vs SomaGold
Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.
SixtyNine EA leads on 5 of the 5 measures that can be scored.
A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.
- Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost
- 1.85▲
- 1.56▲
- Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss
- 1.21▲
- 1.16▲
- Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high
- 23.3%▲
- 46.5%▲
- Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall
- 8.27▲
- 0.81▲
- Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate
- 39.36%▲
- 8.87%▲
- Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it
- 60.4%▲
- 57.4%▲
- Record lengthHow much evidence there is
- 9 months▲
- 6 months▲
- TradesSample size behind every figure above
- 568▲
- 392▲
- Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans
- 1588.1%▲
- 63.1%▲
- Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance
- $500▲
- $5,000▲
Why these two are not quite like-for-like
- The tracked accounts are 10× apart in size. Percentage growth compounds much faster on a small balance, so the growth figures are not the like-for-like they look.
What each record shows
MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
SixtyNine EA
Nothing in the published figures raised a flag. The checks that need trade-level data could not be run.
Measured from published statistics · 568 trades · 9 months
Read the full page →MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
SomaGold
- Unbounded losses
Measured from published statistics · 392 trades · 6 months
Read the full page →