Forex Tool Data

Head to head

Quantum Queen X MT5vsZerqon EA

Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.

Quantum Queen X MT5 leads on 4 of the 5 measures that can be scored.

A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.

Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost
2.69
1.36
Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss
0.82
0.18
Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high
11.2%
17.7%
Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall
6.08
4.61
Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate
14.98%
27.34%
Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it
76.5%
88.5%
Record lengthHow much evidence there is
28 months
7 months
TradesSample size behind every figure above
1,525
1,500
Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans
5130.4%
442.7%
Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance
$100
$300

Why these two are not quite like-for-like

  • One record is 4.1× longer than the other — Quantum Queen X MT5 has had more time to meet a market it dislikes, which cuts both ways when reading its drawdown.
  • The tracked accounts are 3× apart in size. Percentage growth compounds much faster on a small balance, so the growth figures are not the like-for-like they look.

What each record shows

MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD

Quantum Queen X MT5

  • Grid / basket positions
  • Unbounded losses

Measured from trade history · 1,525 trades · 28 months

Read the full page →

MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD

Zerqon EA

  • Grid / basket positions
  • Small wins, large losses

Measured from trade history · 1,500 trades · 7 months

Read the full page →