Head to head
Neo DeltavsQuantum Queen X MT5
Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.
Quantum Queen X MT5 leads on 3 of the 5 measures that can be scored.
A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.
- Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost
- 2.20▲
- 2.69▲
- Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss
- 0.44▲
- 0.82▲
- Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high
- 6.7%▲
- 11.2%▲
- Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall
- 1.20▲
- 6.08▲
- Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate
- 19.95%▲
- 14.98%▲
- Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it
- 83.3%▲
- 76.5%▲
- Record lengthHow much evidence there is
- 0 months▲
- 28 months▲
- TradesSample size behind every figure above
- 6▲
- 1,525▲
- Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans
- 8.1%▲
- 5130.4%▲
- Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance
- $500▲
- $100▲
Why these two are not quite like-for-like
- One record is 71× longer than the other — Quantum Queen X MT5 has had more time to meet a market it dislikes, which cuts both ways when reading its drawdown.
- The tracked accounts are 5× apart in size. Percentage growth compounds much faster on a small balance, so the growth figures are not the like-for-like they look.
What each record shows
MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
Neo Delta
No risk flags raised by the trade history.
Measured from trade history · 6 trades · 0 months
Read the full page →MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
Quantum Queen X MT5
- Grid / basket positions
- Unbounded losses
Measured from trade history · 1,525 trades · 28 months
Read the full page →