Head to head

My AI GoldvsOnyx MT5

Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.

Onyx MT5 leads on 3 of the 5 measures that can be scored.

A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.

Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost: 2.24; 3.54▲
Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss: 0.56▲; 0.17
Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high: 43.6%; 18.9%▲
Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall: 5.24; 6.80▲
Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate: 93.15%▲; 46.69%
Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it: 80.0%; 95.3%
Record lengthHow much evidence there is: 4 months; 5 months
TradesSample size behind every figure above: 95; 64
Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans: 1425.7%; 595.8%
Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance: $300; $1,000

Full pageView My AI Gold →View Onyx MT5 →

Why these two are not quite like-for-like

The two are measured from different sources — My AI Gold from trade history, Onyx MT5 from published statistics. The ratios are computed the same way, but only a trade-by-trade history supports the full set of risk checks.
The tracked accounts are 3× apart in size. Percentage growth compounds much faster on a small balance, so the growth figures are not the like-for-like they look.

What each record shows

MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD

My AI Gold

No risk flags raised by the trade history.

Measured from trade history · 95 trades · 4 months

Read the full page →