Head to head
LizardvsThunderGold Scalper
Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.
Lizard leads on 3 of the 5 measures that can be scored.
A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.
- Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost
- 2.30▲
- 1.67▲
- Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss
- 0.76▲
- 0.65▲
- Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high
- 14.7%▲
- 12.2%▲
- Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall
- 3.21▲
- 3.71▲
- Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate
- 19.00%▲
- 16.92%▲
- Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it
- 75.2%▲
- 71.5%▲
- Record lengthHow much evidence there is
- 4 months▲
- 4 months▲
- TradesSample size behind every figure above
- 161▲
- 137▲
- Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans
- 91.8%▲
- 75.9%▲
- Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance
- $250▲
- $100▲
What each record shows
MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
Lizard
- Grid / basket positions
- Unbounded losses
Measured from trade history · 161 trades · 4 months
Read the full page →MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
ThunderGold Scalper
No risk flags raised by the trade history.
Measured from trade history · 137 trades · 4 months
Read the full page →