Head to head
GoldenShotvsLizard
Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.
GoldenShot leads on 5 of the 5 measures that can be scored.
A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.
- Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost
- 322.50▲
- 2.30▲
- Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss
- 21.50▲
- 0.76▲
- Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high
- 0.0%▲
- 14.7%▲
- Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall
- 321.50▲
- 3.21▲
- Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate
- 60.58%▲
- 19.00%▲
- Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it
- 93.8%▲
- 75.2%▲
- Record lengthHow much evidence there is
- 0 months▲
- 4 months▲
- TradesSample size behind every figure above
- 16▲
- 161▲
- Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans
- 18.7%▲
- 91.8%▲
- Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance
- $100▲
- $250▲
Why these two are not quite like-for-like
- One record is 12.3× longer than the other — Lizard has had more time to meet a market it dislikes, which cuts both ways when reading its drawdown.
What each record shows
MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
GoldenShot
No risk flags raised by the trade history.
Measured from trade history · 16 trades · 0 months
Read the full page →MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
Lizard
- Grid / basket positions
- Unbounded losses
Measured from trade history · 161 trades · 4 months
Read the full page →