Head to head
De MoorevsQuantum King EA
Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.
De Moore leads on 3 of the 5 measures that can be scored.
A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.
- Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost
- 6.56▲
- 2.38▲
- Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss
- 0.74▲
- 0.77▲
- Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high
- 4.6%▲
- 8.0%▲
- Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall
- 10.55▲
- 15.49▲
- Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate
- 33.55%▲
- 12.62%▲
- Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it
- 89.8%▲
- 75.5%▲
- Record lengthHow much evidence there is
- 3 months▲
- 13 months▲
- TradesSample size behind every figure above
- 187▲
- 539▲
- Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans
- 122.2%▲
- 388.3%▲
- Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance
- $300▲
- $100▲
Why these two are not quite like-for-like
- One record is 4.8× longer than the other — Quantum King EA has had more time to meet a market it dislikes, which cuts both ways when reading its drawdown.
- The tracked accounts are 3× apart in size. Percentage growth compounds much faster on a small balance, so the growth figures are not the like-for-like they look.
What each record shows
MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
De Moore
- Grid / basket positions
Measured from trade history · 187 trades · 3 months
Read the full page →MT5 · Expert Advisor
Quantum King EA
- Grid / basket positions
- Unbounded losses
Measured from trade history · 539 trades · 13 months
Read the full page →