Head to head
ArtQuant GoldvsGoldbot One MT5
Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.
ArtQuant Gold leads on 4 of the 5 measures that can be scored.
A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.
- Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost
- 3.13▲
- 1.50▲
- Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss
- 0.86▲
- 1.33▲
- Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high
- 3.2%▲
- 25.8%▲
- Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall
- 9.88▲
- 2.71▲
- Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate
- 26.19%▲
- 4.38%▲
- Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it
- 78.4%▲
- 53.1%▲
- Record lengthHow much evidence there is
- 3 months▲
- 22 months▲
- TradesSample size behind every figure above
- 541▲
- 418▲
- Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans
- 91.5%▲
- 152.7%▲
- Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance
- €1,000▲
- $671▲
Why these two are not quite like-for-like
- One record is 7.7× longer than the other — Goldbot One MT5 has had more time to meet a market it dislikes, which cuts both ways when reading its drawdown.
- The accounts are denominated differently (EUR and USD), so every currency amount below is in its own unit. The ratios are unaffected.
What each record shows
MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
ArtQuant Gold
- Grid / basket positions
- Unbounded losses
Measured from trade history · 541 trades · 3 months
Read the full page →MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
Goldbot One MT5
- Grid / basket positions
Measured from trade history · 418 trades · 22 months
Read the full page →