Head to head

Almanac GoldvsOsloma FlipPro MT5

Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.

Almanac Gold leads on 3 of the 5 measures that can be scored.

A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.

Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost: 2.76▲; 2.27
Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss: 1.14▲; 1.06
Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high: 0.5%▲; 4.8%
Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall: 5.40; 7.08▲
Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate: 2.53%; 35.46%▲
Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it: 70.7%; 68.0%
Record lengthHow much evidence there is: 1 months; 1 months
TradesSample size behind every figure above: 99; 319
Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans: 3.0%; 53.5%
Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance: $100,000; $500

Full pageView Almanac Gold →View Osloma FlipPro MT5 →

Why these two are not quite like-for-like

The tracked accounts are 200× apart in size. Percentage growth compounds much faster on a small balance, so the growth figures are not the like-for-like they look.

What each record shows

MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD

Almanac Gold

Grid / basket positions

Measured from trade history · 99 trades · 1 months

Read the full page →