Head to head
AI Aurum PivotvsZerqon EA
Both sets of figures are computed the same way from each product's own record. The measures that can be read against each other — the unit-free ratios — are scored. The ones that depend on how big the account was or how long it ran are shown underneath, unscored, because putting a winner on them would be comparing two different questions.
AI Aurum Pivot leads on 4 of the 5 measures that can be scored.
A count of rows, not a recommendation. Which of these measures matters is a question about the account it would run on.
- Profit factorEverything won divided by everything lost
- 2.05▲
- 1.36▲
- Payoff ratioAverage win divided by average loss
- 1.87▲
- 0.18▲
- Max drawdownDeepest fall from a previous high
- 8.6%▲
- 17.7%▲
- Recovery factorNet profit per unit of worst fall
- 10.97▲
- 4.61▲
- Growth per monthTotal growth compounded to a monthly rate
- 11.92%▲
- 27.34%▲
- Win rateNot scored — a high win rate is only good if the payoff supports it
- 52.2%▲
- 88.5%▲
- Record lengthHow much evidence there is
- 8 months▲
- 7 months▲
- TradesSample size behind every figure above
- 90▲
- 1,500▲
- Total growthNot comparable on its own — the records cover different spans
- 154.2%▲
- 442.7%▲
- Account sizePercentages compound faster on a small balance
- $300▲
- $300▲
Why these two are not quite like-for-like
- The two are measured from different sources — AI Aurum Pivot from published statistics, Zerqon EA from trade history. The ratios are computed the same way, but only a trade-by-trade history supports the full set of risk checks.
What each record shows
MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
AI Aurum Pivot
Nothing in the published figures raised a flag. The checks that need trade-level data could not be run.
Measured from published statistics · 90 trades · 8 months
Read the full page →MT5 · Expert Advisor · XAUUSD
Zerqon EA
- Grid / basket positions
- Small wins, large losses
Measured from trade history · 1,500 trades · 7 months
Read the full page →